On-demand Discovery · Continuous Intelligence (data model + UI only in V1)
Discovery recommends. Hermes coordinates. Ari decides.
DEVELOPMENT FIXTURES — not real current research · MOCKSTATIC All counts and findings below are loaded fixture data, not live research. No REAL findings exist in V1.
New
4
fixture data only
Reviewed
1
fixture data only
Promoted
1
fixture data only
Conflicting Evidence
1
fixture data only
Filters
Simple attribute filters only — no semantic search, no vector DB. Every filter is a plain GET link; no JavaScript.
FACTVerifiable claim backed by a named source. Without independent support it stays UNVERIFIED.
USER COMPLAINTA reported user pain from a community/forum/review source — real to the reporter, not yet verified as a widespread problem.
TRENDRepeated signal across sources. Never escalated on its own; watch for corroboration.
ASSUMPTIONAn unvalidated internal belief. Stays ASSUMPTION until tested with real user evidence.
OPPORTUNITYAn actionable possibility assessed from evidence (LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH) — an assessment, not a score.
CONFLICTING EVIDENCESources disagree — a contradiction is visible and unresolved. Conflicting findings are never auto-resolved and never escalated until a human reconciles them.
Evidence discipline
Every finding visibly distinguishes FACT / USER COMPLAINT / TREND / ASSUMPTION / OPPORTUNITY and shows source, URL (if present), date, confidence and provenance. UNKNOWN or missing evidence never silently becomes HIGH confidence. Contradictions are shown as CONFLICTING EVIDENCE and are never auto-resolved. Opportunity level (LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH) considers: user pain, evidence strength, strategic relevance, implementation burden, differentiation potential. It remains an assessment, not mathematical truth.
A CONTINUOUS finding is escalated to Hermes only when it is relevant, materially useful, evidence-backed, and not trending noise.
Findings (2 of 7 shown · fixture data)
Counts and findings reflect the loaded MOCK/STATIC fixtures only — they are not production intelligence.
DF-002USER COMPLAINTON DEMANDNEWMOCK
Offline edit loss reported in example note community
Users in an example note-taking forum thread report losing offline edits after sync conflicts.
Project
example-note-app
Confidence
MEDIUM
Relevance
HIGH
Opportunity
MEDIUM
Source
Public forum thread (example) https://forum.example.com/threads/123
Source date
2026-09-20
Captured at
2026-10-04
Recommended next action
Feed to the Product Planning Cell as a candidate problem statement.
UI semantics only. V1 has no write API: promotion/dismissal is LOCKED preview. A promoted finding is reviewed by Hermes before the Product Architect / Product Critic act on it — discovery never bypasses the Planning Cell and never creates build tasks from weak signals.